Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
United States of America v. Kent E. Hovind
May 2, 2011
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
KENT E. HOVIND
The opinion of the court was delivered by: M. Casey Rodgers United States District Judge
This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated April 13, 2011. (Doc. 397). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.
2. The Government's motion to dismiss (doc. 385) is GRANTED;
3. Defendant's Motion to Read all Grand Jury information (doc. 374) is DENIED;
4. Defendant's Motion to Produce Brady Materials (doc. 377) is DENIED.
5. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the Indictment (doc. 389) is DENIED.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw ...