Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Dale A. Copemann v. Brain Fundenburg and

November 3, 2011

DALE A. COPEMANN, PLAINTIFF,
v.
BRAIN FUNDENBURG AND EDWARD D. WILKINS, DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: M. Casey Rodgers Chief United States District Judge

ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated October 3, 2011. (Doc. 12). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint (doc. 10) is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).

3. Plaintiff's Amended Motion for Leave to Proceed Informa Pauperis (doc. 9) is DENIED.

M. Casey Rodgers

20111103

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.