Pending before the Court is Defendant's Unopposed Motion For Entry of Judgment With Remand. (Doc. 19). Defendant requests the Court to remand this case to the Commissioner so that the Commissioner can take further administrative action in this case. Defendant represents that Plaintiff has no objection to the remand.
Pursuant to Title 42, United States Code, Section 405(g) the Court is empowered to reverse the decision of the Commissioner with or without remanding the cause for a rehearing. Shalala v. Schaefer, 113 S. Ct. 2625 (1993). The failure of the ALJ to develop the record constitutes sufficient grounds for remand. Brissette v. Heckler, 730 F.2d 548 (8th Cir. 1984), appeal after remand 613 F. Supp. 722 (E.D. Mo. 1985), judgment aff'd in part, rev'd in part, 784 F.2d 864 (8th Cir. 1986). Where the district court cannot discern the basis for the Commissioner's decision, a sentence-four remand may be appropriate to allow him to explain the basis for his decision. Falcon v. Heckler, 732 F.2d 827, 829-30 (11th Cir. 1984) (holding remand was appropriate to allow the ALJ to explain the basis for the determination that the claimant's depression did not significantly affect her ability to work and treating psychologist acknowledged that claimant had improved in response to treatment and could work in a supportive, noncompetitive, tailor-made work environment). On remand under sentence four, the ALJ should review the case on a complete record, including any new material evidence. Diorio v. Heckler, 721 F.2d 726, 729 (11th Cir. 1983) (finding that it was necessary for the ALJ on remand to consider psychiatric report tendered to Appeals Council); Reeves v. Heckler, 734 F.2d 519, 522 n. 1 (11th Cir. 1984) (holding that the ALJ should consider on remand the need for an orthopedic evaluation).
Therefore, following a careful review of the record and filings, the Court agrees with the parties that it is appropriate to remand this matter to the Commissioner. Accordingly, it is:
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:
(1) Defendant's Unopposed Motion For Entry of Judgment With Remand (Doc. 15) is hereby GRANTED.
(2) This action is hereby REVERSED AND REMANDED pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)*fn1 to the Commissioner for the following reason:
For the Administrative Law Judge to: (1) clarify Plaintiff's residual functional capacity (RFC) and explain in detail the evidence used to support that finding; (2) give further consideration to Plaintiff's past relevant work (PRW) by comparing the physical and mental requirements of the PRW with Plaintiff's established RFC; (3) if Plaintiff cannot perform his PRW, consider whether there is other work he can perform and request Vocational Expert testimony in compliance with the agency's Hearings, Appeals and Litigation Law Manual (HALLEX) provisions 1-2-7-30, 1-2-5-58, 1-2-5-55, and 1-2-5-78; (4) consider whether Plaintiff's subsequent application should be consolidated with his present claim; and (5) any other proceedings the Commissioner deems appropriate.
(3) The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment accordingly, terminate any pending motions, and close the file.
(4) The hearing scheduled for December 13, 2011 is CANCELLED.