Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Ronnie Ray Daw, Sarah Louise Daw, Candida Rose Daw v. Department of Children and Families

November 23, 2011

RONNIE RAY DAW, SARAH LOUISE DAW, CANDIDA ROSE DAW, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, ET AL. DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Roger VINSON Senior United States District Judge

ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated October 24, 2011 (doc. 24). Plaintiffs' have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely filed objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Plaintiffs Ronnie Ray Daw and Sarah Louise Daw's motion for voluntary dismissal (doc. 22) is GRANTED and the docket shall reflect that these Plaintiffs are no longer a party to this action.

Roger Vinson

20111123

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.