Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

David Maus and Mark Ornstein v. John Patrick Ennis

November 30, 2011

DAVID MAUS AND MARK ORNSTEIN, PLAINTIFF,
v.
JOHN PATRICK ENNIS, A/K/A THE IMMANUEL ADONAI-ADONI, A/K/A GOD, DEFENDANT.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Dr. Rabbi Sollog

ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on the Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 98) filed by the Defendant, John Patrick Ennis ("Ennis"). Ennis contends that the registration of the domain names at the heart of this dispute have expired and that somehow*fn1 this deprives the Court of jurisdiction over this dispute. Ennis is incorrect.

Even assuming arugendo that the domain names have expired, and that this makes it impossible for them to be transferred to the Plaintiffs, a number of issues would remain to be litigated in this case. For example, the Plaintiffs contend that Ennis' actions violated the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(d). If the Plaintiffs were to prevail on that claim, they would be entitled to an award of actual damages and a possible award of attorneys' fees. See 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a).

In con sideration of the foregoing, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 98) is DENIED.

Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.