Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Harry Michael Wright v. Morris Young

January 9, 2012

HARRY MICHAEL WRIGHT, PLAINTIFF,
v.
MORRIS YOUNG, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gary R. Jones United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

On December 6, 2011, Defendants Keyshonda Thompson and Lamonte Peterson filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint for failure to state a claim. (Doc. 22.) N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 7.1(C)(1) provides "Each party opposing a motion shall have fourteen (14) days from the date of service of the motion in which to file and serve a responsive memorandum with citation of authorities in opposition to the motion." As of the date of this Order, Plaintiff has neither filed a response nor filed a motion for an extension of time to respond to the motion to dismiss.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff shall respond to the Motion To Dismiss filed by Defendants Keyshonda Thompson and Lamonte Peterson (Doc. 22) on or before January 30, 2012.

2. Failure to comply with this Order in the allotted time will result in a recommendation to the district judge that the motion to dismiss be granted pursuant to N.D.Fla.Loc. Rule 7.1(C) for failure to file a responsive memorandum.

Gary R. Jones

20120109

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.