Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Andrew Romeo Johnson v. Warden Pippen

February 17, 2012

ANDREW ROMEO JOHNSON, PLAINTIFF,
v.
WARDEN PIPPEN, DEFENDANT.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: M. Casey Rodgers Chief United States District Judge

ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated October 21, 2011. (Doc. 31). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Defendant's motion to dismiss (doc. 27) is GRANTED. 3. Plaintiff's amended complaint (doc. 7) is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997(e) and for abuse of the judicial process. The dismissal of this case shall count as a strike pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

M. Casey Rodgers

20120217

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.