Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Daniel L. Wright v. United States of America

February 23, 2012

DANIEL L. WRIGHT, PETITIONER,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENT.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: M. Casey Rodgers Chief United States District Judge

ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated. (Doc. 16). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, challenging Petitioner's conviction out of this district in case number 4:99cr22-RH, is DENIED as Petitioner has failed to demonstrate that the § 2255 remedy is inadequate or ineffective under § 2255(e).

3. Petitioner's Motion for Appointment of Counsel and for an Evidentiary Hearing (doc. 18) is DENIED.

M. Casey Rodgers

20120223

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.