Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Kemp

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Panama City Division

February 7, 2017

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
ABIGAIL LEE KEMP USM No. 68950-019

          Michelle K. Daffin (AFPD) Defendant's Attorney:

          JUDGMENT IN A CRIMINAL CASE

          Robert L. Hinkle United States District Judge

         The defendant pleaded guilty on Counts 1, 2, 3, and 4, of the second superseding indictment on July 11, 2016. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the defendant is adjudged guilty of such counts which involve the following offenses:

TITLE/SECTION NUMBER

NATURE OF OFFENSE

DATE OFFENSE CONCLUDED

COUNT

18 U.S.C. § 1951

Conspiracy to Interfere with Commerce by Robbery

February 12, 2016

1

18 U.S.C. §§ 924(c)(1)(A)(ii) and 2

Use/Brandishing of a Firearm During a Crime of Violence and Aiding and Abetting

February 12, 2016

2

18 U.S.C. §§ 1951 and 2

Interfere with Commerce by Robbery and Aiding and Abetting

August 11, 2015

3

18 U.S.C. §§ 924(c)(1)(A)(ii) and 2

Use/Brandishing of a Firearm During a Crime of Violence and Aiding and Abetting

August 11, 2015

4

         The defendant pleaded guilty on Counts 1 and 3 of the indictment on December 28, 2016. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the defendant is adjudged guilty of such counts which involve the following offenses:

TITLE/SECTION NUMBER

NATURE OF OFFENSE

DATE OFFENSE CONCLUDED

COUNT

18 U.S.C. § 1951 and 2

Interfere with Commerce by Robbery and Aiding & Abetting

April 28, 2015

1

18 U.S.C. § 1951 and 2

Interfere with Commerce by Robbery and Aiding & Abetting

August 5, 2015

3

         Count 2 is dismissed on the motion of the United States.

         Case No. 5:16cr30-001

         The defendant pleaded guilty on Count of the indictment on December 28, 2016. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the defendant is adjudged guilty of such count which involves the following offense:

TITLE/SECTION NUMBER

NATURE OF OFFENSE

DATE OFFENSE CONCLUDED

COUNT

18 U.S.C. § 1951 and 2

Interfere with Commerce by Robbery and Aiding & Abetting

September 2, 2015

1

         Case No. 5:16cr31-001

         The defendant pleaded guilty on Count 1 of the information on December 28, 2016. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the defendant is adjudged guilty of such count which involves the following offense:

TITLE/SECTION NUMBER

NATURE OF OFFENSE

DATE OFFENSE CONCLUDED

COUNT

18 U.S.C. § 1951 and 2

Interfere with Commerce by Robbery and Aiding & Abetting

January 4, 2016

1

         The defendant is sentenced as provided in the following pages of this judgment. The sentence is imposed pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984.

         It is ordered that the defendant shall notify the United States attorney for this district within 30 days of any change of name, residence, or mailing address until all fines, restitution, costs and special assessments imposed by this judgment are fully paid. If ordered to pay restitution, the defendant must notify the court and United States attorney of material changes in economic circumstances.

         IMPRISONMENT

         The defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the United States Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a term of:

         In No. 5:16cr3: 84 months on counts 1 and 3, to run concurrently, plus 12 months consecutive on count 2, plus 24 months consecutive on count 4, for a total of 120 months.

         In each of No. 5:16cr26, 5:16cr30, and 5:16cr31, 120 months, to run concurrently with one another and with the sentence in No. 5:16cr3, so that the total combined sentence for all four cases is 120 months.

         The Court recommends to the Bureau of Prisons in order of priority:

1. If the defendant is convicted and sentenced to custody on additional federal or state charge, the new sentence should be served concurrently with or consecutively to the sentence imposed by this judgment, as ordered or recommended by the new sentencing judge. This judge recommends that the Bureau of Prisons designate a state facility for service of this federal sentence, thus in effect making this federal sentence concurrent with any later state sentence, if the state sentencing judge so orders or recommends.
2. The defendant should participate in a residential drug-abuse program and in cognitive behavioral therapy.
3. The defendant should be designated to a facility as near as possible to the Northern District of Florida.

         The defendant is remanded to the custody of the United States Marshal.

         RETURN

         I have executed this judgment as follows: _______

         Defendant delivered on ______ to ______ at______, with a certified copy of this judgment.

         SUPERVISED ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.