final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
of Original Jurisdiction - Habeas Corpus Lower Tribunal No.
Antonio Doll, in proper person.
Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for respondents.
LOGUE, SCALES and LUCK, JJ.
Doll petitions this Court for a writ of habeas corpus,
claiming that he is entitled to immediate release from prison
because he was improperly designated a habitual violent
felony offender and that his sentences are otherwise illegal.
For the reasons stated below, we deny Doll's instant
petition for a writ of habeas corpus and order Doll to show
cause why this Court should not prohibit him from making
further pro se filings to this Court in circuit court case
November 1992, the jury found Doll guilty of burglary of a
structure with a firearm and aggravated assault. At the
sentencing hearing held in December 1992, the trial court
designated Doll a habitual violent felony offender,
sentencing him to thirty years in prison with a fifteen year
minimum mandatory on the burglary conviction, and to ten
years in prison with a three year minimum mandatory on the
aggravated assault conviction. The court ordered the ten
years to run consecutive to the thirty years, and the minimum
mandatories to run concurrently.
Court affirmed Doll's convictions and sentences on direct
appeal. See Doll v. State, 626 So.2d 221 (Fla. 3d
DCA 1993) (table). Since that time, Doll has filed in this
court at least thirteen postconviction appeals or
instant petition argues that Doll's underlying sentences
are illegal because the trial court's written order
imposing the sentences does not comport with its oral
pronouncements at the sentencing hearing. This court recently
denied this very claim in appellate case number 3D15-2515.
See Doll v. State, 207 So.3d 238 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015)
(table). Doll also claims that he was improperly designated a
habitual violent felony offender. This court rejected this
very claim in appellate case number 3D04-1854. See Doll
v. State, 917 So.2d 881 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005). We deny the
TO SHOW CAUSE
hereby directed to show cause, within forty-five days from
the date of this opinion, why he should not be prohibited
from filing any further pro se appeals, petitions, motions or
other proceedings related to his criminal sentencing in
circuit court case number 91-37881.
does not demonstrate good cause, any such further and
unauthorized filings by Doll will subject him to appropriate
sanctions, including the issuance of written findings
forwarded to the Florida Department of Corrections for its
consideration of disciplinary ...