Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Alford

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Panama City Division

September 5, 2017

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
MICHAEL RAY ALFORD USM No. 05123-017

          Defendant's Attorney: Jonathan W. Dingus

          JUDGMENT IN A CRIMINAL CASE

          Robert L. Hinkle United States District Judge

         On June 20, 2017, the jury returned a verdict finding the defendant guilty on Counts 1 and 2 of the indictment. Prior to sentencing, the government moved to dismiss Count 2 as duplicative. Count 2 is dismissed. IT IS ORDERED that the defendant is adjudged guilty of Count 1:

TITLE/SECTION NUMBER

NATURE OF OFFENSE

DATE OFFENSE CONCLUDED

COUNT

18 U.S.C. §§ 2252A(a)(2), and 2252A(b)(1)

Receipt of Child Pornography

December 9, 2014

1

         The defendant is sentenced as provided in the following pages of this judgment. The sentence is imposed pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984.

         It is ordered that the defendant shall notify the United States attorney for this district within 30 days of any change of name, residence, or mailing address until all fines, restitution, costs and special assessments imposed by this judgment are fully paid. If ordered to pay restitution, the defendant must notify the court and United States attorney of material changes in economic circumstances.

         IMPRISONMENT

         The defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the United States Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a term of 180 months.

         The Court recommends to the Bureau of Prisons in order of priority:

1. The defendant said in a written submission he would rather die than be in prison. This may have been an advocacy technique. But the defendant should be evaluated for any appropriate measures.
The defendant faces state revocation proceedings arising from conduct related to the federal offense of conviction. See presentence report ¶ 63. This federal sentence should be consecutive to or concurrent with any sentence imposed in the state proceeding as ordered or recommended by the state sentencing judge. If the state sentencing judge imposes a concurrent sentence, the Bureau of Prisons should designate a state facility for service of this federal sentence, to the extent necessary to give full effect to the state sentencing judge's decision.

         The defendant is remanded to the custody of the United States Marshal.

         RETURN

         I have executed this judgment as follows: _____________ ___________________

         Defendant delivered on __________to at____________, with a certified copy of this judgment.

         SUPERVISED RELEASE

         Upon release from imprisonment, the defendant shall be on supervised release for a term of Life

         MANDATORY ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.