Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Rolle v. West

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Ocala Division

March 26, 2018

RANDALL LAMONT ROLLE, Plaintiff,
v.
SHERRI WEST, EMILLY GLENN, MICHAEL MACNAMARA, KEVIN CARROLL, JAMES SHELFER, JOHN CAMPBELL, and CITY OF TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA, Defendants. RANDALL LAMONT ROLLE, Plaintiff,
v.
RODERICK ROBINSON, DEMETRIS TAYLOR, STACEY SHARPE, THOMAS GANO, GEORGIA CHAPPLEMAN, MARTIN FITZPATRICK, and CITY OF TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA, Defendants. RANDALL LAMONT ROLLE, Plaintiff,
v.
JAMES SHELFER, EMILLY GLENN, SHERRI WEST, LACEY KANTOR, JOHN CAMPBELL, MARTIN FITZPATRICK, and CITY OF TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA, Defendants. RANDALL LAMONT ROLLE, Plaintiff,
v.
CITY OF TALLAHASSEE, OWEN MCCAUL, JAMES HANKINSON, M. LILJA DANDELAKE, JOHN MACELUCH, RICHARD HOOD, DAVID COLLINS, THOMAS BATEMAN, JAMES WOLF, SCOTT MAKER and STEPHANIE RAY, Defendants. RANDALL LAMONT ROLLE, Plaintiff,
v.
CITY OF TALLAHASSEE, OWEN MCCAUL, THOMAS BATEMAN, KENNETH DAVID, FRANK SHEFFIELD, ADAM RUIZ and DAVID COLLINS, Defendants. RANDALL ROLLE, Plaintiff,
v.
CHARLES PERRY, SAM BRUCE, RANDY FRAZEY, MIKE RAGAN, MARTY WEST, MIKE WOMBLE and CITY OF TALLAHASSEE, Defendants.

          OMNIBUS ORDER

          JAMES S. MOODY JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

         THIS CAUSE comes before the Court the Report and Recommendations submitted by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis in these six cases. In all of the cases, Plaintiff Randall Rolle has brought suit against persons involved in his 2002 state court conviction and subsequent probation violation proceedings- including prosecutors, judges, and law enforcement officers. His claims have repeatedly been dismissed as frivolous, and this Court has previously imposed sanctions against Plaintiff. See Rolle v. City of Tallahassee, et al., No. 5:15-cv-462-Oc-30PRL, Doc. 9 (M.D. Fla. Oct. 8, 2015).

         Despite the previous dismissals and sanctions, Rolle has continued to bring the same and similar frivolous claims, always seeking to proceed in forma pauperis. The Magistrate Judge determined that each of the lawsuits Plaintiff filed in his most recent barrage are frivolous. The Magistrate Judge also recommends that this Court revoke Plaintiff's IFP privileges prospectively-a sanction that was imposed on Plaintiff in the Northern District of Florida, where he files similar lawsuits. See Rolle v. Dilmore, et al., No. 4:16-cv-425-RH-GRJ (N.D. Fla. May 23, 2017).

         Plaintiff has objected to the R&Rs, arguing the Magistrate Judge misapplied the law and misconstrued the facts. After reviewing the objections, the Court determines they all lack merit. So the Court concludes, after careful consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge in conjunction with an independent examination of the file, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations should be adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects.

         Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:

         1. The Report and Recommendations[1] of the Magistrate Judge are adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects and are made a part of this omnibus order for all purposes, including appellate review.

         2. Plaintiff Randall Rolle's Motions to Proceed in Forma Pauperis[2] are DENIED.

         3. The Clerk is directed to close the following cases: 5:18-cv-8; 5:18-cv-13; 5:18-cv-18; 5:18-cv-25; 5:18-cv-45; and 5:18-cv-46.

         4. The Court further orders that Plaintiff Randall Rolle's IFP privilege is REVOKED, and the Clerk is directed to refuse to accept any more of Plaintiff s filings relating to his 2002 state court conviction and subsequent probation violation proceedings that are not accompanied by full payment of the appropriate filing fee

         DONE and ORDERED.

---------

Notes:

[1] The R&Rs are as follows: 5:18-cv-8, Doc. 8; 5:18-cv-13, Doc. 9; 5:18-cv-18, Doc. 8; 5:18-cv-25, Doc. 7; 5:18-cv-45, Doc. 3; and 5:18-cv-46, Doc. 4.

[2] The Motions to Proceed in Forma Pauperis are as follows: 5:18-cv-8, Doc. 2; 5:18-cv-13, Doc. 2; 5:18-cv-18, Doc. 2; 5:18-cv-25, Doc. 2; 5:18-cv-45, ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.