United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Ocala Division
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 
R. LAMMENS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
who is proceeding pro se, has filed a complaint against the
State of Florida Child Support Program attempting to assert
various constitutional claims relating to the suspension of
his driver's license. (Doc. 1). Plaintiff has filed a motion
to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. 2). By prior order, the
Court conducted a frivolity review of the complaint pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) and granted Plaintiff until
September 9, 2019 to file an amended complaint. (Doc. 7).
Plaintiff has failed to file an amended complaint, and the
time for doing so has expired. For the following reasons,
Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2)
should be denied and the complaint (Doc. 1) should be
individual may be allowed to proceed in forma pauperis if he
declares in an affidavit that he “is unable to pay such
fees or give security therefor.” 28 U.S.C. §
1915(a)(1). However, before a plaintiff is permitted to
proceed in forma pauperis, the Court is obligated to review
the complaint to determine whether it is frivolous,
malicious, “fails to state a claim upon which relief
may be granted[, ]” or . . . “seeks monetary
relief against a defendant who is immune from such
relief.” Id. § 1915(e)(2). If the
complaint is deficient, the Court is required to dismiss the
suit sua sponte. Id.
Court previously explained, Plaintiff's complaint does
not meet the pleading requirements set forth in in the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff's complaint
does not contain a short plain statement of the claim, as
required by Rule 8, and it does not delineate the alleged
causes of action into counts or another organized manner as
required by Rule 9. Most importantly, Plaintiff did not
allege any facts to support his claim that Defendant acted in
violation of law. Although Plaintiff is proceeding pro se, he
is “still required to conform to procedural rules, and
the court is not required to rewrite a deficient
pleading.” Washington v. Dept. of Children and
Families, 256 Fed.Appx. 326, 327 (11th Cir. 2007).
despite the lack of fact allegations, the Court presumes that
Plaintiff is challenging state child support proceedings that
resulted in the suspension of his driver's license. Such
a claim would likely be barred by the Rooker-Feldman doctrine
which precludes lower federal courts from reviewing final
state court judgments. See D.C. Court of Appeals v.
Feldman, 460 U.S. 462 (1983); Rooker v. Fidelity
Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413 (1923); Brown v.
Coffin, 766 Fed.Appx. 929, 931 (11th Cir. 2019)
(applying the Rooker-Feldman doctrine to the review of a
state court child support proceeding).
Plaintiff did not provide any basis to support filing this
action in the Middle District of Florida. “A civil
action may be brought in- (1) a judicial district in which
any defendant resides, if all defendants are residents of the
State in which the district is located; (2) a judicial
district in which a substantial part of the events or
omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial
part of property that is the subject of the action is
situated; or (3) if there is no district in which an action
may otherwise be brought as provided in this section, any
judicial district in which any defendant is subject to the
court's personal jurisdiction with respect to such
action.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). Here, Plaintiff does
not allege that the Defendant resides in the Middle District
or that any events relating to the action occurred here.
reasons stated above, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED that
Plaintiffs Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis (Doc.
2) be DENIED, and the Complaint (Doc. 1) be DISMISSED.
 Within 14 days after being served with
a copy of the recommended disposition, a party may file
written objections to the Report and Recommendation's
factual findings and legal conclusions. See Fed.R.Civ.P.
72(b)(3); Fed. R. Crim. P. 59(b)(2); 28 U.S.C. §
636(b)(1)(B); Local Rule 6.02. A party's failure to file
written objections waives that party's right to challenge
on appeal any unobjected-to factual finding or legal
conclusion the district judge adopts from the Report and
Recommendation. See 11th Cir. R. 3-1.
 In Florida, the Child Support Program
is a part of the Florida Department of Revenue. Child
Support, Fla. Dep't of Revenue,