Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Burks v. State

Florida Court of Appeals, Third District

October 23, 2019

Brandon BURKS, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Page 865

          An appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jose L. Fernandez, Judge. Lower Tribunal No. 07-36268B

          Brandon Burks, in proper person.

          Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

         Before EMAS, C.J., and FERNANDEZ, and MILLER, JJ.

         OPINION

         MILLER, J.

         Appellant, Brandon Burks, challenges the denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. On appeal, Burks contends the imposition of a previously omitted minimum mandatory sentence by the lower tribunal, following our

Page 866

remand in Burks v. State, 237 So.3d 1060 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) ("Burks II"), is violative of double jeopardy principles. For the reasons set forth below, we disagree and affirm.

         Following a jury trial, Burks was convicted of attempted first-degree murder with a firearm in violation of sections 775.087, 777.04(1), and 782.04(1)(a), Florida Statutes, aggravated assault with a firearm in violation of sections 784.021(1)(a) and 775.087, Florida Statutes, and resisting an officer without violence in violation of section 843.02, Florida Statutes. The jury specifically found that during the commission of the offense of attempted first-degree murder, Burks possessed a firearm, which he discharged, inflicting great bodily harm.

         The trial court sentenced Burks to a term of life imprisonment on the attempted first-degree murder count as a prison releasee reoffender ("PRR"), pursuant to section 775.082(9)(a)(3)(a), Florida Statutes. The court declined to impose a further nondiscretionary minimum mandatory required under section 775.087(2)(a)(3), Florida Statutes, "commonly known as the ‘10-20-Life’ statute," finding an additional, concurrent term to be redundant. Mendenhall v. State, 48 So.3d 740, 742 (Fla. 2010) (citation omitted).

         This court subsequently affirmed Burks’ convictions and sentences on direct appeal. See Burks v. State, 57 So.3d 972 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) ("Burks I"). Burks then sought to correct his sentence, through Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800, contending that the trial court erred in failing to impose the 10-20-Life minimum mandatory. This Court agreed and remanded the case to the lower tribunal for resentencing. See Burks II .

         Pursuant to our mandate, the lower tribunal imposed an additional 25-year minimum mandatory under the 10-20-Life statute, to run concurrent with the PRR term of life imprisonment. Burks filed a further motion to correct illegal sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800, contending the newly imposed sentence was violative of double jeopardy. The trial court denied relief. The instant appeal ensued.

          STAND ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.